Rhetorical Analysis on Two Selected Articles: ‘’The Culture of Shut-Up’’ and ‘’the Struggle Over Media Literacy’’
1.0 Article Introduction
1.1 The Culture of Shut-up
A recent article by Jon Lovett on The Atlantic's site, "The Culture of Shut Up"—contends effectively that ensuring opportunity of discourse is presently up to each of us in this Internet age. As institutional watchmen lose their energy to control data, which ends up less demanding toward oneself designated individual guards to venture in. The very basic result becomes awful, flaring allegations and control tinged calls for statement of regret (or more regrettable) because of online substance. More so regardless of how dumb, unwarranted, preposterous or hostile we should seriously mull over what we hear or read, a feeling of tolerance is simply piece of the arrangement. So we should cut the brutal verbally abusing and charges. As Lovett prompts; "We have to quit letting each other know about our odd feelings with voracious postage on internet".
1.2 The Struggle over Media literacy
The goal of media literacy is to help people become sophisticated citizens rather than sophisticated consumers. The authors argue against a purely “text-centered” approach in which media texts can be deconstructed and analyzed so we can choose among them. Instead, media literacy should integrate a textual analysis with questions of production and reception. Media literacy is, therefore, a way of extending democracy to the place where democracy is increasingly scripted and defined. Media literacy should be about helping people to become sophisticated citizens rather than sophisticated consumers and should be understood as more than a collection of texts to be deconstructed and analyzed so that we can distinguish or choose among them while they should be analyzed as sets of institutions with particular social and economic structures that are neither inevitable nor irreversible.
2.0 Identifying the Purpose of the Article ‘’ The Culture of Shut-up’’ How we convey as a general public is dependent upon every one of us. Innovation regularly races in front of the social ramifications for adjusting to it. The Internet has turned into the essential vehicle for the blast of correspondence helping the developing intricacy on the planet. Presently the time has come when we must contemplate what we mean by correspondence. By what method can pioneers of maintainable quality hold the line against the "society of quiets down" in backing of advancing open and capable correspondence about sustainability concerns.
3.0 Highlighting the Main Points on Article ‘’ The Culture of Shut-up’’ • Firstly, regardless of how dumb, unwarranted, preposterous or hostile we should seriously mull over what we hear or read, a feeling of tolerance is simply piece of the arrangement. Great thoughts can originate from where we wouldn't dare hoping anymore, slightest acknowledge, and differing qualities of discourse is the best nursery for supporting them. • Secondly, we should really assume liability for what we say, that implies imparting intentionally, recognizing the cases we make, and substantiating them with proof and illustrations. We do so perceiving that our cases are constrained by our own particular sifting frameworks our own particular predispositions and suspicions as is valid for every individual in the public eye. • Thirdly, and maybe above all, we must take bravery and danger talking up. In the event that vital, don't recoil from saying something that some may characterize as "beyond reach," disregarding unwritten social standards of "adequacy." And we have to do this in light of why correspondence flexibility matters.
4.0 Comment on the Author’s Style and Voice on Article ‘’ The Culture of Shut-up’’ Like never before, correspondence today relies upon the option to suit the development of new thoughts. It's the way developments develop, how social orders advance their...
References: Bagdikian, B. (1997). The media monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press.
Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. New York: Hill & Wang.
Barthes, R. (1975). The pleasure of the text. London: Jonathan Cape.
Barthes, R. (1988). Mythologies. New York: Noonday Press.
Herman, E., & McChesney, R. (1997). The global media: The new missionaries of corporate capitalism. London: Cassell.
Hobbs, R. (1996). Media literacy, media activism. Telemedium, The Journal of Media Literacy, 4213).
Leavis, R. (1950). The great tradition: George Eliot, Henry James, Joseph Conrad. London: Chatto & Windus.
Schiller, H. (1996). Information inequality: The deepening social crisis in America. New York: Routledge.
Schiller, H. (1984). Information and the crisis economy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Schiller, H. (1989). Culture Inc.: The corporate takeover of public expression. New York: Oxford University Press.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document