Internet Sexual Addiction
It seems that the Internet has become an ever-growing part in numerous areas of the everyday lives of people. One area that is worthy of further study involves sexual addiction and how it is related with too much use of the Internet. Some scholars allege that sociopaths are starting to emerge online and it has been dubbed as “technological addictions”. This article looks at Internet addiction with respect to excessive sexual behavior. It includes discussions of the notion of addiction to sex and whether the entire notion is viable. This will be achieved through the assessment of the small quantity of available empirical data. It also concludes that sex on the Internet is a new form of expression that may encourage partaking due to the identified disinhibition factors and anonymity. Also, it was claimed that even though there is only a small amount of empirical data, Internet sexual addiction is existent and that there are several prospects for future research on the subject.
Extreme sexual behavior
It is perhaps a reasonable assumption to make that most scholars—especially those who work on the subject of addiction—do not regard extreme sex to be an addiction. There have been numerous criticisms on the notion of sexual addiction from various points of view. Goodman (1992) summarized these as follows: • Moral. Sexual behavior as an addiction demoralizes the person’s responsibility for the way he or she behaves. • Scientific. Free usage of the term “addiction” has caused it to be meaningless (Coleman, 1986). • Conventional. Addiction must be defined physiologically because it is, to begin with, a physiological condition (Levine & Troiden, 1988; Coleman, 1986). • Sociological. Addiction is just a term used to describe behavior that diverges from the norms of society (Levine & Troiden, 1988; Coleman, 1986). In spite of a rather negative theoretical viewpoint towards the notion of sexual addiction, it has not put a stop to the progress of research in this field. The notion of extreme sexual behavior being pathologised is no longer something new. Across the centuries, extreme sex has been described in various ways and examples of illnesses and conditions caused by it are urethromania, sexual hyperversion, satyriasis, pathologic promiscuity, pathologic multi-partnerism, pansexual promiscuity, oversexuality, nymphomania, the Messalina Complex, libertinism, erotomania, Don Juan Complex, Don Juan Syndrome, Don Juan(ita)ism, compulsive sexuality, compulsive promiscuity, and the Casanova type (Orford, 1985). Until very recently, a whole lot more was written regarding female forms of extreme sexual behaviors (for example, nymphomania) which was viewed more negatively than male forms of extreme sex (for example, satyriasis). This is, in all probability, because of the sexual double standard present in our society. As a matter of fact, an assessment of the pre-80’s literature on sexuality would have people suppose that there are a lot more female “sex addicts” than males. In reality, however, female sexual addiction is somewhat rare, and it is the males who are significantly more likely to be addicted to sex.
Is extreme sex truly an addiction?
Compared with other forms of addictive behaviors, sexual addiction has not originally been regarded as a valid form of addiction. Nonetheless, depending on how addiction has been defined, it is evident that extreme sexual behavior shares similar connection and likenesses with other more recognized form of addiction. Similar to a pathological gambler or an alcoholic, sex addicts cannot stop themselves from committing self-destructive sexual behaviors. As a matter of fact, sex addicts will normally take no notice of grave physical, interpersonal, and emotional repercussions of their behaviors. The repercussions of extreme sexual behavior are extensive and can bring about despair, low self-esteem, loss of interest in...
References: Barak, A., Fisher, W.A., Belfry, S. & Lashambe, D.R. (1999). Sex, Guys, and Cyberspace: Effects of Internet pornography and individual differences on men’s attitudes toward women. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 11, 63-91.
Barth, R.J. & Kinder, B.N. (1987). The mislabeling of sexual impulsivity. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 13, 15-23.
Carnes, P. (1999). Dr. Carnes online resources for sexual addiction recovery. (Located at http://www.sexhelp.com/)
Carnes, P.J. (1999). Editorial : Cybersex, sexual health, and the transformation of culture. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 6, 77-78.
Coleman, E. (1986). Sexual compulsion vs. sexual addiction: The debate continues. SIECUS Report, 14(6), 7-11.
Cooper, A. & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance in Cyberspace: Understanding online attraction. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 22, 7-14.
Cooper, A. (1998a). Sexuality and the Internet: Surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1, 181-187.
Cooper, A., Delmonico, D. & Burg, R. (2000). Cybersex users, abusers, and compulsives: New findings and implications. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Cybersex : The Dark Side of the Force, pp. 5-29. Philadelphia : Brunner : Routledge.
Cooper, A., Putnam, D.E., Planchon, L.A. & Boies, S.C. (1999). Online sexual compulsivity: Getting tangled in the net. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 6, 79-104.
Cooper, A., Scherer, C., Boies, S.C. & Gordon, B. (1999). Sexuality on the internet: From sexual exploration to pathological expression. Professional Psychology : Research and Practice, 30, 154-164.
Freeeman-Longo, R.E. & Blanchard, G.T. (1998). Sexual abuse in America: Epidemic of the 21st century. Brandon, VT : Safer Society Press.
Freeeman-Longo, R.E. (2000). Children, teens, and sex on the Internet. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Cybersex: The Dark Side of the Force, pp. 75-90. Philadelphia : Brunner : Routledge.
Goodman, A. (1992). Sexual addiction : Designation and treatment. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 18, 303-314.
Griffiths, M.D. (2000a). Excessive internet use: Implications for sexual behavior. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 537-552.
Joinson, A. (1998). Causes and implications of disinhibited behavior on the Internet. In J. Gackenback (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications. Pp.43-60. New York: Academic Press.
Kafka, M.P. (1993). Update on paraphilias and paraaphilia-related disorders. Currents in Affective Illness, 12, 4-8.
Levine, M.P. & Troiden, R.R. (1988). The myth of sexual compulsivity. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 347-363.
Orford, J. (1985). Excessive Appetites: A Psychological View of the Addictions. Chichester : Wiley.
Orzack, M.H. & Ross, C.J. (2000). Should virtual sex be treated like other sex addictions? In A. Cooper (Ed.), Cybersex: The Dark Side of the Force, pp. 113-125. Philadelphia: Brunner: Routledge.
Schneider, J. P. (2000). Effects of cybersex addiction on the family: Results of a survey. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Cybersex: The Dark Side of the Force, pp. 31-58. Philadelphia : Brunner: Routledge.
Schwartz, M.F. & Southern, S. (2000). Compulsive cybersex: The new tea room.. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Cybersex : The Dark Side of the Force, pp. 127-144. Philadelphia: Brunner: Routledge.
The Guardian (1999). Blue money. The Guardian (Online), May 27: p.5.
Young, K. (2000). (Located at http://www.netaddiction.com/).
Young, K.S. & Rogers, R.C. (1998). The relationship between depression and Internet addiction. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1, 25-28.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document